Welfare of livestock and poultry has become a highly-publicized political issue. And, like so many political matters in nowadays, the welfare debate has split the public into two sides and created a huge business. Animal protectionists are lobby for legislation regulating animal welfare and ownership. Opponents of those regulations argue that these regulations are unnecessary and that rather better enforcement of current regulations and better education of animal owners and the general public are needed instead of more stringent regulations. Moreover, they claim that 1) the proposed changes will make animal agriculture uncompetitive globally, and thus animal food production will be outsourced to countries with less animal welfare concerns, and potentially threaten food security; or, 2) cost of food production will rise considerably and food will become unaffordable for the less-fortunate in this country. Two main arguments have emerged: one based mostly on emotions, and the other on the basis of efficiency and economics. Not surprisingly, the result is at times a rather dirty trench war, with neither side moving an inch.
Both sides seem to ignore the true complexity of the system of food production. Often, a discussion about animal welfare revolves around very specific issues. Regulation of a single welfare issue will only be a band-aid and never address the complex food production system thoroughly. I argue that, until we clearly understand the deeper ins and outs of food production, we will never deliberate on animal welfare issues in a constructive manner, let alone find acceptable solutions. We should aim to find simplicity beyond complexity, yet over-regulation of animal welfare aims for simplicity without recognizing the complexity of food production.